The plans show a change to a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The plans give information on the renovations made to a small theater in 2012 compared to 2010.
Overall, the general layout of the theater underwent some major changes including the overall size and added features.
In 2010, the theater's main entrance was located in the middle of a cafe to the right and a ticket office and an admin office to the left. An auditorium was set up in front of a stage with 2 rows of chairs in the middle of the room. A media room was placed right behind the stage with the storage to the left.
In 2012, however, the entrance area was expanded with the relocation and replacement of the cafe with a restaurant. The ticket office was moved to where the cafe was, while the admin office stayed at roughly the same place. The overall size and layout of the auditorium remained unchanged while the stage increased by half in size. The space used for the media room in 2010 was reduced in size and repurposed as a hall, whereas the storage was moved to an extended space to the right of the stage. On the left side was the media room with a newly added space reserved for showers right next to it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...le the stage increased by half in size. The space used for the media room in 2010 w...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42583732057 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27597350636 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468899521531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7436307249 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.5 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149716268166 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750566786814 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126826028769 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160449724371 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160578082036 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.