process of Pe uh raw tea and ripe tea

Essay topics:

process of Pe'uh raw tea and ripe tea

Production diagram illustrating the production process of raw and mature tea in Pu-erh.

In general, there are 2 main stages in the process of making 2 types of tea, starting from frying with a pan, and after completing, 2 products will be obtained: Pu-erh ripe tea and ancient Pu-erh raw tea.

In the Pu-erh ripe tea, there must be many steps. First, the leaves are put in a large pan to be fried and lose the enzymes. The leaves are rolled and dried under the sunshine in the second step. Then, they are transformed into loose raw tea and go through fermentation by mold and become Loose ripe tea. Finally, they are compressed and turned into Pu-erh ripe tea.

To make Raw tea, they need to take 3 steps. After compressing from Loose raw tea to Pu-erh raw tea, they are brewed by storage and become vintage Pu-erh raw tea. The process of making raw tea look like simple compared to ripe tea.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h ripe tea and ancient Pu-erh raw tea. In the Pu-erh ripe tea, there must be m...
^^^
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a and ancient Pu-erh raw tea. In the Pu-erh ripe tea, there must be many step...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, second, then, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55214723926 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28164779705 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496932515337 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.5147166676 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.486699459451 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245043458484 0.103423049105 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148298808658 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354510900577 0.15604864568 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098390846859 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.