The two pie charts compare and contrast the data on the changes in the government expense on some kinds of Arts (namely Visual arts, theater, music, literature) in 1995 and 2005, while the bar chart gives information about the number of people who joined these Arts in the same period of time.
Generally speaking, the amount of money the government spending on music and visual arts witnessed a remarkable decrease, whereas that on the others saw an upward trend saw in two given years. In detail, about half of the money from the Government spent on music in 1995 and then the figure reduced to 38 percent in the year of 2005. Also, the figure in Visual arts went down about a haft from 1995 to 2005. In contrast, the government expenditure on theater increased markedly by more than 20 percent and that on literature experienced a slight growth from about 10 percent to around 12 percent.
When it comes to the total quantity of people taking part in these arts, it is clear to see from the chart that, almost all the categories saw a higher number of people in 2005 in comparison to that in 1995, except for the visual arts. To specify, citizens joining the music field was always with the highest number, just under 125,000 in 1995 and exactly 150,000 in 2005. Meanwhile, the figures for the last category were just one-third as low as the one mentioned above. On the other hand, the number of people going to the visual arts had a tiny decrease, from 50,000 to approximately 48,000 in 1995 and 2005, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eople who joined these Arts in the same period of time. Generally speaking, the amount of mon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, third, whereas, while, except for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4128826626 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6048759681 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.888888889 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303355843819 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129685765131 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742298210263 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208927815065 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450753428081 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.