The two pie charts compare and contrast the data on the changes in the government expense on some kinds of Arts (namely Visual arts, theatre, music, literature) in 1995 and 2005, while the bar chart gives information about the number of people who joined these Arts in the same period.
Generally speaking, the amount of money the government spending on music and visual arts witnessed a remarkable decrease, whereas that on the others saw an upward trend saw in two given years. In detail, the 50% budget of the Government spent on music in 1995 and then that reduced to 38 per cent in 2005. Also, the figure for Visual arts went down about a haft from 1995 to 2005. In contrast, the government expenditure on theatre increased markedly by more than 20 per cent, moreover, that on literature experienced a slight growth from about 10 per cent to around 12 per cent.
From the bar chart, it is clear that the number of people in 2005 was usually higher than that in 1995, except for the visual arts. To specify, citizens involving in the music field ware always with the highest number, just under 125,000 in 1995 and 150,000 in 2005. Meanwhile, the figures for the last category were one-third as low as the one mentioned above. However, the number of people going to the visual arts had a tiny decrease, from 50,000 to approximately 48,000 in 1995 and 2005.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, third, whereas, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64315352697 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3776187061 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560165975104 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7087765941 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.333333333 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320151564601 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135872822526 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747059636917 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215743766679 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359251127035 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.