Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
The line graph illustrates the changes in the amount of chicken, beef, lamb and fish which was consumed weekly by each person in Europe over a period of 25 years.
It is clearly seen that the consumption of chicken increased significantly while ones of the others types of meat had opposite trend.
Looking at the detail, chicken was the only kind of food which had an upward trend in the consumption. In 1979, the consumption of chicken was the third position compared with the amount of beef, lamb and fish with under 150 grams, but this figure boosted to 250 grams per person in 7 days and was used the most popularly in the years 1999 and 2004. During this period, the proportion of the consumption of fish was the smallest and fluctuated around 50 grams each person in a week.
By contrast, the amount of beef and lamb witnessed a considerable decrease from 1979 to 2004. In 1979, each resident in a European country consumed about 225 grams of beef per week, but after 25 years, this statistic declined dramatically to more 100 grams in 2004. There was the same trend in the amount of lamb in this period. People in this country made cutbacks at their consumption of lamb from 150 grams in 1979 to appropriate 50 grams each person per week in 2004.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, third, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57522123894 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46761465642 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0032097735 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0291331634175 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0150856477779 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0117099732788 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0205315867534 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00245551623842 0.0819641961636 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.