Some people think that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it can cause the loss of national identities.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
According to some people some business and cultural contact between countries will help the country in a positive way. However others argue that this can be detrimental to the country's nationality. I think, this would bring economic development to the country.
On one side,, increasing trade with other countries means exchanging of products between countries. If one country imports something that does not integrate with the culture then this can make negative impact. This can also happen for importing services as well. For example, by broadcasting too many Indian TV channels to Bangladesh, people became addicted to certain TV program. Young generation specially school students are effected by this and this also caused them to score lower grades.
On the other hand, Importing necessary goods also help to develop other economic sectors as well. Like, Bangladesh imports electricity from India which is essential to the garments industry. Beside that no country can produce everything they need. This is specially applicable to energy sector. For example, China imports natural gas from Russia, what is impossible for them to produce. So in this scenario china has no option but procure gas from outside of the country. Thinking of nationality will only bar any potential economic development. Therefore international relation benefits the economic development of any country.
In conclusion, the drawback globalization brings in undeniable but the economic benefits it brings along with it is greater than it's drawbacks. I believe, every nation should open it's door to all countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...between countries will help the country in a positive way. However others argue that this can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ill help the country in a positive way. However others argue that this can be detriment...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...velopment to the country. On one side,, increasing trade with other countries m...
^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... one side,, increasing trade with other countries means exchanging of products between co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...changing of products between countries. If one country imports something that does...
^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'garments'' or 'garment's'?
Suggestion: garments'; garment's
...ty from India which is essential to the garments industry. Beside that no country can pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...bar any potential economic development. Therefore international relation benefits the eco...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48987854251 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80174814242 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635627530364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6214729581 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3333333333 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7222222222 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207117905432 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621444885423 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726211553112 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138973051975 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102160920859 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.97 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.