Education is always a critical field that should be set up and monitored carefully. It has recently been believed that the school curriculum should take science of food and way to make it into account, while others think schooling just needs to have important subjects like maths or physics. This essay will discuss my both views about this issue and suggest the best option that studying educating system could take as a reference.
In terms of obtaining food science into school time, that might bring some benefits to students. By knowing about what are contained in food that we eat evereday is very good and positive for our health. For instance, if a girl wanted to keep fit, it would be almost impossible when she does not recognise how many calories has been absorbed to her body. Hence, learning food science could help her to read and control the number of energy more properly and efficiently. Furthermore, studying the some recipes of cooking is another favor which supports students, particularly the female, a lot in their personal lives when they have to prepare meals for their own.
On the flip side, things will be different if we look into actual education system. It seems that core subjects like maths are still highly appreciated by schools and families rather than subjects that serve practical experiences. This is understandable as students are acquired to get an academic degree. As a result, they are forced to learn much on those seemingling important subjects. By adding science of food to their school time will accidentally put more pressure on their shoulders, which is more serious for students who are struggling with their theorical knowledge at schools.
In conclusion, I assume that students can totally study food science and stuff relating to this subject because of advantages they might take through it, but it is the case when general education criteria can actually be changed in order to minimize the heavy stress of main subjects had on their students.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... efficiently. Furthermore, studying the some recipes of cooking is another favor whi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 5.60731707317 642% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99101796407 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57158440701 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 106.607317073 193% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3919215223 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299791818675 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852272385625 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057121658129 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165964327793 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620073463009 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... efficiently. Furthermore, studying the some recipes of cooking is another favor whi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, hence, if, look, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 5.60731707317 642% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99101796407 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57158440701 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 106.607317073 193% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3919215223 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299791818675 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852272385625 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057121658129 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165964327793 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620073463009 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.