The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain. The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed.
The table depicts information regarding the budget of Britain police and the two pie charts illustrate the way it was allocated between 2017 and 2018. Overall, it is clear that all the examined sources have increased in which National Government maintained the largest financial support. Moreover, the amount of money spent for Officers and staff’s salaries were outnumbered Technology and Buildings and transport sectors.
In terms of the sources of Police budget, National Government registed the largest contributor which slightly rose by 2.3 m, from 175.5m to 177.8m. In addtion, there was a significant increase in the amount of Local taxes by over 11m to reach 102.3m in 2018 whereas Other sources ( eg grants) accounted for the small minority sources at around 38m in two years.
Regarding the distribution of budget, the salary for officers and staff witnessed a dramatically decrease from 75% to 69%, followed by Technology sector which was remained 17% over that period. Additionally, the figure for Buildings and transports was approximately doubled at 14% in 2018, but still the lowest contributor.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach 102.3m in 2018 whereas Other sources eg grants accounted for the small minori...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...salary for officers and staff witnessed a dramatically decrease from 75% to 69%, followed by Technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35428571429 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86932261081 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3396715478 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203575659168 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957356451024 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123313532084 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136103961038 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717670015763 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach 102.3m in 2018 whereas Other sources eg grants accounted for the small minori...
^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...salary for officers and staff witnessed a dramatically decrease from 75% to 69%, followed by Technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35428571429 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86932261081 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.3396715478 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203575659168 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957356451024 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123313532084 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136103961038 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717670015763 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.