The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates projected populations and realities in three different urban areas.
Overall, it is apparent that in 1990, the number of Sao Paulo dwellers are always the highest while these figures in Jakarta are lower than in Shanghai.
Go into specific details, In 1990, the Sao Paulo people accomplished 15 million and experts have given predictions that the numbers would increase during the next ten years with 24 million. But at a prospective point of time, it just got 18 million, different from previous projections.
Similar situations also took place with the rest. At the beginning of the period, the Shanghai population is 13,5 million, higher than Jakarta's 4 million dwellers. Considering 2000, the predicted people in both 2 cities substantially soared together. But depending on the particular facts that in 2000, the residents are lower than previously indicated numbers. Additionally, the distinct point shown while Jakarta people has risen during 10 years period from 9,5 to 11,5 million, Shanghai took a mildly fall from 13,5 to 12,5 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, different from previous projections. Similar situations also took place with ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...viously indicated numbers. Additionally, the distinct point shown while Jakarta p...
^^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('mildly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('fall') instead of another adjective.
...from 9,5 to 11,5 million, Shanghai took a mildly fall from 13,5 to 12,5 million.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30409356725 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76107629132 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66081871345 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4520063072 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0800270153563 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397023468807 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498369529357 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658811144804 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566611161233 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.