The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.

The given table compares the data on average distance in miles per person by forms of travel in England in 1985 and 2000.

We can see from the table that car had the highest average distance in both years and the average distance of all forms of travel increased significantly during the period of 15 years.

On the one hand, the average distance of bicycle was 51miles in 1985 and lessened slightly to 41 in 2000. In addition, the statistics of local bus decreased noticeable from 429 in 1985 to 274 in 200 while the distance of walking in 1985 was 255 and decreased to 237 in 2000.

On the other hand, the data on average distance of car was highest in both years with almost 3,200 in 1985 and 4,806 in 2000. Additionally, the figure of long distance bus travel in 2000 was nearly two times higher than in 1985 while the figure of train and other modes of travel also increased from 289 and 450 in 1985 to 366 and 585 in 2000 correspondingly. Overall, the average distance of all kinds of travel increased from 4.470 miles to almost 6.500 miles during the period of 15 years.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly during the period of 15 years. On the one hand, the average distance of...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46231155779 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.382768117 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427135678392 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6408355304 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204335278145 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114918864593 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703860764903 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14795524689 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664791548959 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly during the period of 15 years. On the one hand, the average distance of...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46231155779 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.382768117 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427135678392 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6408355304 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204335278145 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114918864593 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703860764903 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14795524689 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664791548959 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.