the table representing itself by having five languages along with the majority of speakers who used them as an maiden language.
A quick look at the chart enough to make it clear that Mandarin Chinese took huge preference of people. However, language Portuguese is not as eminent as the mandarin Chinese. In fact, it stood at the lowest point.
Turning to the further details, mandarin Chinese have exactly 1090 million speakers from which 900 million are speaking it as first language and rest of are its additional speakers. The most surprising fact is that no other language is prioritise except mandarin Chinese even English stand in 3rd position in case of having native speakers and it has only 339 million people who speak it as first language. Nonetheless, speakers who are accepting it second language are crossed all languages due to the emergence of English and that is 603 million.
Moving forward towards the remaining information, the total number of individuals who are using Hindi are accounted for 490 million with maximum native speakers. As compared to the other languages, Arabic and Portuguese showed minor differences just 17 million in number of speakers. from both of them Portuguese Have least native people who make it first in their priority list.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the table representing itself by having fiv...
^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e majority of speakers who used them as an maiden language. A quick look at the c...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prioritised'.
Suggestion: prioritised
...ising fact is that no other language is prioritise except mandarin Chinese even English st...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seconds'?
Suggestion: seconds
...etheless, speakers who are accepting it second language are crossed all languages due ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: million
...uguese showed minor differences just 17 million in number of speakers. from both of them Portugue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... just 17 million in number of speakers. from both of them Portuguese Have least nati...
^^^^
Line 4, column 313, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'Have the least'.
Suggestion: Have the least
... speakers. from both of them Portuguese Have least native people who make it first in thei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, nonetheless, second, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08571428571 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60888069934 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3454963945 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191523265464 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737294822208 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063070777765 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114286140066 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665035212775 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.