The table below gives information about population in Australia and Malaysia in 198o and 2002.
Summarise information and make comparison which relevant.
The table compares data about actual situations of population in two distinct areas Australia and Malaysia in the years 1998 and 2002 in terms of six aspects.
Overall, while a total number of population increased significantly in both countries during this period, there was an opposite trend between proportion of male and female. This was also some differences in the percentage of birth, average yearly growth of population and aging population.
After 22 years, the population size of both nations raised considerably. In detailed, in Australia, the proportion of population increased from 14.7 million in 1980 to 19.6 million in 2002 whilst this figure in Malaysia in 2002 nearly doubled compared with its previous data, reaching 24.3 million. Regarding of the rate of men and women, Australia witnessed a steady proportion in both indicators while these statistics in Malaysia fluctuated 0,3%.
There was a decrease in the rate of birth by 0,2% and 1% in Australia and Malaysia properly. Average annual proportion growth in Australia has up trend slightly by 0,1%, in contrast, this rate of Malaysia declined from 2,4% to 2,1%. When making comparision about the number of people who are aver 65 years old, it is clearly seen that this figure in both Australia and Malaysia rosed substantially by 2,8% and 0,6% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... comparision about the number of people who are aver 65 years old, it is clearly seen t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'averred'.
Suggestion: averred
...sion about the number of people who are aver 65 years old, it is clearly seen that t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23255813953 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84587316141 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7240785366 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195084415589 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852645557724 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517375324264 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129256884148 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582527473281 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.