The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
The chart illustrates the difficulties faced by young people in two different primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of the problems faced by children in school A was higher than that in school B. The proportion of the problems in school A and school B considerably fluctuated in two years.
A dramatic decrease in the percentage of both concentration in lessons and following instructions was seen from 2005 to 2015, with the proportions of students face concentration in lessons and following instructions dropping to its lowest point, at 18%. The percentages of students face to the verbal expression of ideas in school A in 2005 were 42% and 40% respectively which higher than the figures for school B at the same time.
The students in school A face significant higher proportion of listening skills and spelling which were 35% and 30% respectively than this figures for students in school B. The lowest proportion which students in school A have to face was reading ability, at 22% in 2005, while the figure for school B was 6%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hich were 35% and 30% respectively than this figures for students in school B. The l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9217877095 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98159727111 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458100558659 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0897968778 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290781160289 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178056242716 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842961526837 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225366323906 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088666552031 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.