The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007.
A glance at the table provided reveals the information about the population, distance travelled and freight transported using railway systems in four countries, namely Malaysia, Canada, China and UAE in 2007.
It is evident that China had by far the highest number of rail passengers of 27 million, dominating that of the other countries. Second in terms of train users was in Malaysia, and followed closely by UAE. Numbering 5.5 and 5.9 million respectively, the figures in Malaysia and UAE was almost five times smaller than that of China. In stark contrast, considerably fewer people at a mere 0.3 million travelled with trains in Canada, which was the least amongst the four countries given. Regarding the distance passed by customers, a similar pattern compared to the number of railway users can be observed. Almost 2000 kilometers were travelled by Chinese, whereas in Malaysia and UAE, passengers travelled 770 and 780 km respectively. Canada, meanwhile, saw the least distances passed by travelers at just 80 km.
As of freight carried by each countries, interestingly, the most significant volume was recorded in Canada, accounting for over 28 billion tones. The rest of countries transported somewhere around 22 billion tones on average.
To conclude, China carried more passengers with trains while Canada mainly used the rail systems for freight of goods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32110091743 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84021643391 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614678899083 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8949816292 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13847339368 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493207233764 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757239312488 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100959139089 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898962585199 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.