The table compares and contrasts the data on the differences in the six metro networks in terms of their age, length and the number of passengers using them annually. It can be clearly seen from the table that the subways in London, Paris and Tokyo are the oldest with longer routes and serve more people each year than that in the other cities (namely Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles).
Generally speaking, London, Paris and Tokyo underground systems have the figures which are the highest in all categories. In detail, the London railway is the oldest system opened in 1863 and is also the longest with 394 kilometres of the route. The second longest system, which is in Paris, is only about half the length of the former and was initiated in 1930. However, in spite of the shorter route, the railway in Tokyo serves 1927 million people per year which is the most used.
On the other hand, the other cities metro networks are the newest and have the least value regarding the length of the route and the total quantities of passengers travelling each year. To specify, the latest system is in Los Angeles opened in 2001, but serve more people per year than Kyoto system opened 20 years before. In terms of the length of the route, the Washington DC underground network covers the longest route among three newer ones with 126 kilometres, compared to only 11 kilometres and 28 kilometres of Tokyo and Los Angeles ones, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...t used. On the other hand, the other cities metro networks are the newest and have ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74900398406 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32165994904 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505976095618 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.9876525885 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.444444444 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833166149267 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401617491013 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222184307003 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0602258860361 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256905184017 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.