The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following table shows data on the underground railways system of six metropolis around the world. It is constituted of four columns, representing respectevly: the opening date, its length (the unit of measure is the km) and the millions of passengers per year.
At first glance, it can be noticed that London owns the longest and oldest system, while Los Angeles's subway is relatively new and very limited in its extension.
Beginning with inauguration years, all the cities but L.A. built their systems before the 2000s. London holds the first place in 1863, followed by Paris in 1900.
Regarding the extension of the route and popularity, London once again places itself first, with a 394 km long underground railway. However, with 775 million passengers per year, it is not the most frequented one.
That's Tokyo's case; although it might not be the longest, it is the most used for sure, reaching 1927 million commuters every year.
On the other hand, Kyoto distinguishes itself, along with L.A., for its remarkably low numbers: just 11 kilometers of route and 45 million passengers per year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'metropolis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'metropolises'.
Suggestion: metropolises
... the underground railways system of six metropolis around the world. It is constituted of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ar, it is not the most frequented one. Thats Tokyos case; although it might not be t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hing 1927 million commuters every year. On the other hand, Kyoto distinguishes i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, regarding, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08791208791 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65611465395 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675824175824 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3446583264 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0791061043617 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385565472423 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061260850288 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.039047854609 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394118275004 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.