The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.

The below table describe percentage application of diverse kinds of transportation tools in shanghai in 1996 and also predict the feasible popularity of them for 2020.
During 1996, six distinct transportation route such as walking, bicycle, scooter, bus, train and car was studied while bus had the maximum proportion by 39% and walking with 7% located at the bottom of table, in addition there was not any information for usage of train.
Table also anticipate proportion of this mode for 2020, whereby car usage will be increased dramatically until 52% and also located at the top list. Furthermore with except of train all other application consuming will diminished and the most amount of decline will occur for bicycle and close to walking will situate at the bottom list of usage by 3%. Other significant prediction refer to popularity growing of train which will be able to achieve the 13% population.
We could infer from so-called table, which car will be become the most popular transport mode while the usage of it overcome sum applying of other devices.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...l 52% and also located at the top list. Furthermore with except of train all other applicat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...in all other application consuming will diminished and the most amount of decline will occ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05649717514 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71007473903 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61581920904 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3141854732 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.166666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149993807392 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822126791025 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801717568182 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108109664475 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817591357154 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.2329268293 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.