The table below gives information about values (NZ$) of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012.
The given table illustrates data regarding how much money New Zealand earned from exporting kiwi fruit to five different countries over the course of two years, commencing in 2010.
As can be inferred from the table, while there was an upward trend in the amount of New Zealand’s kiwi fruit exports to Japan, China, and Russia, the opposite was true for Mexico and Sudi Arabia. Another key feature is that the largest figure was recorded for Japan’s exports over the examined period.
In 2010, the value of the exports of kiwi to Japan was $ 217,100,000 whereas the figures for China was significantly lower, at $74,900,000. In the following two years, all of them increased to $325,300,000 and $94,000,000 respectively. This period experienced a dramatic increase in Russia's imports from $968,000 to $2,404,0000.
In terms of other countries, the exports to Mexico market was $6,000,000 before dropping to 3,300,000. Similarly, the surveyed period witnessed a decline of over $200,000 exports to Saudi Arabia.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$217'.
Suggestion: $217
...lue of the exports of kiwi to Japan was $ 217,100,000 whereas the figures for China ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as $ 217,100,000 whereas the figures for China was significantly lower, at 4,900,...
^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wing two years, all of them increased to 25,300,000 and 4,000,000 respectively. T...
^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...crease in Russias imports from 68,000 to ,404,0000. In terms of other countrie...
^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntries, the exports to Mexico market was ,000,000 before dropping to 3,300,000. S...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o market was ,000,000 before dropping to 3,300,000. Similarly, the surveyed perio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70371933358 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654320987654 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.24126458 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.125 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196086445167 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903770161436 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992994121635 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142365946841 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108339577049 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.