The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant.Write at least 150 words.

The table chart presents the proportion of consumer spending on three items by five European countries in 2002. Overall, the expenditure on food, drinks and tobacco is significantly higher than the other two categories in all five countries.

Food, drinks and tobacco consumption accounts for an average 20% of total spending, with Turkey and Ireland about one third and a least 16% in Italy, Spain and Sweden.

Expenditure on clothes and shoes covered approximately 6 per cent, a much lower consumption than food and drinks. Although Italy spent the most among the five countries in question, the proportion only made up under 10%. Sweden, in particular, saw a minimum of 5.4% spending on clothing and footwear.

In contrast, all five countries allocated less than 5% of their expense on entertainment and education. Expenditure on these items in Spain and Ireland was a minimal 1.98% and 2.21% respectively, and a similar proportion of 3.2% was shared by Italy and Sweden. The maximum spending in this category was by Turkey, 4.35%, still a much smaller proportion than the former two categories.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... Turkey and Ireland about one third and a least 16% in Italy, Spain and Sweden. ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, third, in contrast, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18994413408 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88832758764 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597765363128 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5724581784 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109778031838 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519174494364 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654083477473 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070293376384 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536998458324 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.