The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
The given table presents information about the change in number of visitors in six distinctive world heritage sites in Australia, with a correcting data in every two years from 1996 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that Great Barrier Reef shows the highest amount of visitors in each year. Likewise, popularity for Blue Mountains, Tasmania Wilderness and Shark Bay experienced an overall increasing trend, despite a Shark Bay’s fluctuation dramatically dropped. However, some places lost their popularity over the given four years, namely Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve and Macquarie Island.
In 1996, Great Barrier Reef welcomed 1,670,000 tourists. This number then increased dramatically and hit the highest number of 3,200,000 in 2000. While the second attractive site was Central Eastern Rainforest Reverse which underwent a consistently decline every year, falling from 810,000 in 1996 to 770,000 in 2000.
By the contrast, more people were keen on Blue Mountains, with the figure rising from 526,000 to 581,000 over the period. Similarly, Tasmania also presented a growth in the number of visitors to 483,000. There was a great rise in the number of tourists in Shark Bay to 102,000 in 1998, followed by a plummeting to 89,000 in the last year which higher than the initial year. While the least attraction was presented at Macquarie Island, decreasing only 20 over the year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years, namely Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve and Macquarie Island. In 1996...
^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...elcomed 1,670,000 tourists. This number then increased dramatically and hit the high...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('consistently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...tern Rainforest Reverse which underwent a consistently decline every year, falling from 810,000 in 199...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...land, decreasing only 20 over the year.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, likewise, second, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35454545455 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71041761291 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5273258905 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.090909091 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164206656758 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057664831075 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707602075458 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114689074754 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901711665443 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.