the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table indicates information about how many visitors used three major British airports over the six-year period, from 1998 to 2003. The figures are given in millions.
Overall, it is interesting to note that there was an upward trend in the number of passengers who chose Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted airports. Besides, what stands out from the table is that except in 2000, travellers who used Gatwick airport were much more popular than two remaining airport.
Looking at the detail, as regards the number of travellers using Gatwick airport, it started at 36,5 million, which was the highest proportion in 1998. Subsequently, the figure was followed by a steady and considerable increase to reach a high of 69,3 million in 2003.
If we looking at Heathrow airport, the number of passengers began at 27,2 million. There was a sharp rise by 21 million in 2000 before keeping in a gradual decrease to just 33,2 million in 2002, which meant that a higher number of travellers used it than other airports. At this point, the figure recovered to become the second popular airport among three ones in 2003 (45,6 million). As for the figure of Stansted airport, the number of people who used it climbed sharply in the first three years, from 17,3 million in 1998 to 39,9 million in 2000. Having a significant rise to 43,3 million in 2001, the figure the remained stable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 287, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'airport' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'airports'.
Suggestion: airports
...re much more popular than two remaining airport. Looking at the detail, as regards th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...33,2 million in 2002, which meant that a higher number of travellers used it than...
^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the second popular airport among three ones in 2003 45,6 million. As for the figure...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, look, second, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86324786325 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48742912954 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0564359124 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.454545455 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207129964599 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834450866268 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743235688808 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147743300401 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570080404257 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.