The table compares and contrasts the data on the changes in students attitudes for five aspects of a university over the 10-year period from 2000 to 2010. The most striking feature from the table is that print resources were always given high percentages of good ratings, whereas the most disappointing thing was always the range of modules offered.
Generally speaking, the period witnessed a growth of students positive attitudes in terms ratio for three fields, namely: teaching quality, print resources and electronic resources as well. Interestingly, the proportions of good ratings for the two formers all had a minimal fluctuation around 65% and 88%, respectively. Besides, electronic resources were the only one which saw a marked increase over ten years, particularly from 2000 to 2005, from 45% in 2000 to 72% in 2005 and a nearly double figure in 2010 (88%).
On the other hand, the figures for the range of modules offered significantly declined by 5% (from 32% in 2000 to 27% in 2010) which were about threefold as low as that for the teaching quality. In addition, the number of students gave good ratings for building/teaching facilities remained unchanged at 77% during the given period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, well, whereas, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10152284264 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87885738369 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593908629442 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.701677697 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.571428571 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267527290774 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123358353066 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672639547975 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185497666268 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419291639961 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.