The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981.
The table compares the changing pattern of number of children that were born by Australian women who were at the age of 40 to 44 in the year of 1981, 1986, 1996 and 2006.
Overall, number of children born significantly reduced from 1981 to 2006. Moreover, two-children family remained as the dominant group over the 25-year period.
In 1981, it is clear that around one-third of the Australian women gave birth to two children, where the figure stood at the highest among all the groups given. Likewise, numbering some 27%, families with three or more children ranked the second. In stark contrast, a mere 8% of the Australian females chose not or to have only one descendants, which was staggering three times less than the those gave born to two children or over.
From 1981 to 2006, evidently a conflicting trend could be witnessed between Australian females who gave birth to less than 2 children and the group with more than 2 children. While the figure for four or more children halved from 27.6% to 11%, a twofold rise happened for the case of having none or only one child. Meanwhile, families with two children remained as the highest figure with significant increase to peak at 38.3%. Lastly, women who gave birth to three children decreased gently by 6% to 21.5%, becoming the second prevailed option among Australian women.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...gure stood at the highest among all the groups given. Likewise, numbering some 27%, fa...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one descendant', 'a descendant', or simply 'descendants'?
Suggestion: one descendant; a descendant; descendants
...alian females chose not or to have only one descendants, which was staggering three times less ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85589519651 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51081450332 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0026922148 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236707204424 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105449775932 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796600885582 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183866655015 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860523575716 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.