The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
The table give information about the people used cycles for work in 12 cities of the UK between 2001 and 2011.
It is clear that the number of people of used cycle to go work in significantly increased over the 10 years. The figured showed eight cities had more than 50 percentage change, while only four countries had less than 50 percentage change throughout the 10 years period.
In 2001, inner London was the first cities were about 43494 people used cycles for commuter, and outer London experienced about 33836, the second highest number of people used cycle for travel. However, at the end of 10 years period, inner London remain in first in list, at 106219 people used cycles. While, outer London, fell down to last place at only 45% of people used cycle to cycling to work.
On the other hand, Brighton, Bristol, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield, Cardiff, and Gateshead, all of them showed a tremendous increase in change of percentage of people use cycle to work, with figures, 109%, 94%,83%,81%,80%,65%,61% respectively. Only three cities experienced less than 50% increase in 10 years period, Leeds, Liverpool, and Outer London, with figures 49%, 48%, and 45% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (London) must be used with a third-person verb: 'remains'.
Suggestion: remains
...he end of 10 years period, inner London remain in first in list, at 106219 people used...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04568527919 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82033490096 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1310428853 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194849853521 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1025062753 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952805200737 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15230148515 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982684975515 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.