the table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
The table illustrates the amount of oil produced in one day by 4 given countries over the period of 4 years from 2000 to 2004.
Overall, there was an increase in the amount of oil production in Nigeria, Chad, and Somalia, while Congo witnessed a gradual decrease in producing oil.
The amount of oil produced in Nigeria started at 205,000 barrels per day, which experience a slight fluctuation at around 190,000 barrels per day, before ending the period at 213,000 barrels in 2004. Meanwhile, Congo which produced the highest amount of oil in 2000 in 4 countries, at 275,000 barrels per day, witnessed a gradual decrease in production from 275,000 to 203,000 barrels per day in 2004.
Only 5000 barrels of oil were made in Somalia in 2000, with a subsequent rise to 50,000 barrels over the period. Chad had not produced any oil until 2002, after which it saw a dramatic increase in the amount of oil production from 8000 barrels per day to 50,000 barrels per day in 2004.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76023391813 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49912265307 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8956732735 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214527200878 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148634164163 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898288258598 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181056687249 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886250945325 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76023391813 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49912265307 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479532163743 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.8956732735 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.666666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214527200878 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148634164163 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898288258598 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181056687249 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0886250945325 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.