The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004.
The given tabular graph provides information about the oil production on daily basis in four various countries between 2000 and 2004, whereas the data is in the number of barrels per day.
Overall, it is seen clearly from the given table that the rate of production in Congo decreased throughout the time, while Chad begun their production in the middle of the period.
To embarks with, as regards Nigeria, accounted for 205,000 barrels in the year 2000, which reached a peak of 230,000 by the end after fluctuated between 189,000 and 211,000 barrels between 2001 and 2003.
Moreover, the rate of Chad was only 8,000 barrels in 2003. This rose drastically to 50,000 barrels in one year. However, Chad did not has any productions before 2003.
Furthermore, the initial figure of Congo was 275,000 barrels, which was the highest by any country in 2000, unfortunately, a declined of more than 70,000 barrels was observed at the end. Lastly, the proportion of oil production in Somalia comprised only 5000 barrels at the beginning year, which inclined in the following four years, By 2004, it was increased to 50,000 barrels per day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 135, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...rels in one year. However, Chad did not has any productions before 2003. Further...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, lastly, moreover, so, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54741191785 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594736842105 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2943247948 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187076497285 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084707434604 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844652897351 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117306063074 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888980359038 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.