The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recored music.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts provide information about how adolescents living in Tokyo listened to music last month, and the results of an international survey about if people liked live or recorded music better.
Overall, while men had a tendency to use MP3 players to listen to music, women preferred live music. It is also clear that the vast majority of people would rather listen to live music.
It can be seen that 79% of males listened to music by MP3 players, followed by live music (60%) and Internet (55%). However, only 19% of male respondents used CDs. For females, live music was the most preferable way of listening to music with the percentage of 44%. This was followed by Internet (42%), and MP3 players (40%). The same as males’ choice, CDs was the least liked with the proportion of 22%.
About music preference, 70% of young people chose live music, whereas those who preferred recorded music was 26%. Especially, 4% of them answered Don’t know when being asked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to live'
Suggestion: to live
...c preference, 70% of young people chose live music, whereas those who preferred reco...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80120481928 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42953383078 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644578313253 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.360206318 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355215759742 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151660371651 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133228522522 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256133843226 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981018024339 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.