The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group

The table illustrates the number of citizens in New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 by 5 different age groups.

What stands out from the graph is that the population of all age groups slightly increased from 2011 to 2012, however, there was a minimal decrease in the number of groups under 15 and 15-39. Besides that, 15-39 was always the highest figure in 5 different groups.

Looking at the graph for more details, the number of citizens of all ages reached 4,381,269 in 2011 then small progress of 4,410,284 was witnessed in the number of that in 2012 and 0,6% was the percentage changed during a year. Similarly, 0,6% also was a change in the 40-64 group, and this group climbed up from 1,331,907 to 1339,898 and it became the second place in 5 different groups. Moreover, the number of 65+ also rose moderately but it is lower than that of the 2 groups above, by 0,4%.

On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 groups were two groups that have a slight drop during the period shown by 0,2%, nevertheless, after changing, 15-39 was still the highest figure in 2012 with 1,574,102 while the population of under 15 just made up a half as low as a group under 15 with 896,364 at the same time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the number of citi...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...11 and 2012 by 5 different age groups. What stands out from the graph is tha...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest figure in 5 different groups. Looking at the graph for more details,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that of the 2 groups above, by 0,4%. On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53456221198 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35555554665 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0436821692 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.571428571 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.5714285714 5.23603664747 336% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240623314503 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126894713506 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108302802256 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181778640051 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887837477891 0.0819641961636 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.85 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.