The table illustrates the number of citizens in New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 by 5 different age groups.
What stands out from the graph is that the population of all age groups slightly increased from 2011 to 2012. while the people aged under 39 had a tendency of reduction, there was a sharp increase in the number of people aged over 40. In addition, the group of people from 15 to 39 was the most crowded; whereas the least for the old generation during the same time.
Looking at the graph for more details, the number of citizens of all ages reached 4,381,269 in 2011 then small progress of 4,410,284 was witnessed in the number of that in 2012 and 0,6% was the percentage changed during a year. Similarly, 0,6% also was a change in the 40-64 group, and this group climbed up from 1,331,907 to 1339,898 and it became the second place in 5 different groups. Moreover, the number of 65+ also rose moderately but it is lower than that of the 2 groups above, by 0,4%.
On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 groups were two groups that have a slight drop during the period shown by 0,2%, nevertheless, after changing, 15-39 was still the highest figure in 2012 with 1,574,102 while the population of under 15 just made up a half as low as a group under 15 with 896,364 at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the number of citi...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...11 and 2012 by 5 different age groups. What stands out from the graph is tha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s slightly increased from 2011 to 2012. while the people aged under 39 had a tendency...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e old generation during the same time. Looking at the graph for more details,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that of the 2 groups above, by 0,4%. On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, still, then, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1066.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46025104603 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33853411216 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.9847081511 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.25 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.875 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.875 5.23603664747 303% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266247802195 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137150724031 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108745083482 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188931829594 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908562540178 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.18 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.