The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates the figure for temporary migrant workers in four nations in the two separate years: 2003 and 2006, and the quantity of these employees per 1,000 local people within these nations in the year 2006.
Overall, the number of temporary migrant workers of all the four countries increased. It is also noticeable that New Zealand was the country with the highest workers per 1,000 indigenous people, and the US was the country with the lowest.
Regarding the temporary migrant employees, the US held the top position with over 570,000 in the first year and rose by over 100,000 in the final year. Australia was ranked second in 2003, at more than 150,000 and grew to 219,000 as the third level. The UK was at the third level in 2003, but achieved the second position in 2006, at over 260,000. New Zealand stood at the bottom level and still maintained that position during the two years: no more than 90,000.
Concerning the ratio of workers to normal people in 2006, the US was ranked last at 2.3. The UK was in the second position, with the figure approximately doubling that of the US. Australia was about 4 times higher than that of the US. New Zealand was the country with the highest workers per 1,000 people, at over 21, around 10 times higher as compared to the figure for the US.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ple, at over 21, around 10 times higher as compared to the figure for the US.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, still, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65236051502 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28021837245 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450643776824 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.208156075 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283673691869 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129565122671 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113769419869 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211355087049 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109124270201 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.