The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished. The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table compares The number of visitors who visit Ashdown museum before and after of museum refurbishment and the charts illustrate the polls asked visitors Satisfaction before and after this change
Overall, what stands out is that the number of people visiting have risen considerably. Moreover,high proportion of visitors were not satisfied before reconstruction, while vast majority of individuals are content with New changes.
As can be seen, exactly half of visitors were very dissatisfied and dissatisfied before redecorating, With 10 and 40 percent respectively, whereas 3/4 of visitors have become satisfied and very satisfied after refurbishment, with 40 and 35% respectively.
before refurbishment just 15% of visitors were very satisfied which it is 35% after it which is considerable change. Another remarkable change refers to dissatisfied group which decrease from 40% before to 15% after refurbishment. Also, very dissatisfied declined by half. In addition the same person of people don't answer or participate to the surveys in both time period come on with just 5%.
this is evident from table that this change was satisfactory attracting more visitors to museum in comparison with the past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , high
...siting have risen considerably. Moreover,high proportion of visitors were not satisfi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...hment, with 40 and 35% respectively. before refurbishment just 15% of visitors were...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied group which decrease from 40% before to 15% after refurbishment. Also, very d...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... very dissatisfied declined by half. In addition the same person of people dont answer o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... In addition the same person of people dont answer or participate to the surveys in...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...th time period come on with just 5%. this is evident from table that this change ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58064516129 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17965189112 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575268817204 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3167740408 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325734687254 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131348911242 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868695515847 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188357260266 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820921960685 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.