The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The table and the chart show the visitors and their satisfaction level of Ashdown Museum the year before and after the museum's restoration. Overall, after the refurbishment, more people came to the museum and they are more satisfied with it.
Before the museum's improvement, there were 74000 people who visited during a year. Then, after the improvement, the number went up to 92000 visitors.
For the satisfaction level, 15% of people are very satisfied with the museum, which grew more than twice of it after the improvement to 35%. The satisfied people also rosse from 30% to 40% of the visitors. Meanwhile, the percentage of dissatisfied visitors greatly declined more than half of it from 40% to 15%. Similarly, percentage of visitors who were very dissatisfied halved from 10% to 5%. Finally, people who didn't give their response stood still at 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...wn Museum the year before and after the museums restoration. Overall, after the refurbi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...e more satisfied with it. Before the museums improvement, there were 74000 people wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ved from 10% to 5%. Finally, people who didnt give their response stood still at 5%.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, similarly, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06338028169 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74630732581 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2047189818 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8888888889 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307204914584 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127374097327 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124223107261 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232354552174 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107974372606 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.