The table below shows the percentage of journey by different means in 4 countries and the bar graph shows the reasons for Canadian people to use a car to reach their workplace.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates which vehicles people from four different countries use while the bar graph gives information about the reason why Canadians choose cars as the main vehicles to commute.
Overall, as can be seen from the table, car was the most common means of transportation, while other vehicles contributed a more insignificant part to the given figures. Meanwhile, in the latter chart, the most popular pretext of people using cars was that they had no other alternatives.
Cars accounted for the most in the table, especially in Canada where the number reached 90%. In the meantime, the percentages in Belgium and Germany were 72% and 68% respectively while the lowest point of this vehicle was 47% in Netherland. However, the ratio between bicycle and car was more than 1:2 in Netherland; on the other hand, the number never outraced 2% in the other countries. Simultaneously, public transport made the most noticeable contribution-18% in Germany and the least- 3% in Canada. About 18% of the population of the Netherland traveled on foot compared to 11% of that of Belgium and Germany; only 5% of Canadian citizens chose to go on foot. The other vehicles only made up negligible parts in the table, without any figures exceeding 3%.
In the latter chart, it was clear that 38% of Canadian residents resorted to cars because they had no other choice. Meanwhile, the need for work was the second most popular reason with 40%. Convenience took up above one-fifth of the population while 12% of people claimed they wanted to be quicker. Work night shift, at the same time, only reached 7%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98141263941 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7831529769 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0937802623 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163527112662 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567741240704 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703240108157 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12399627945 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919535831888 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.