The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tabular chart provides information about the share of women who participated in senior management in three companies from 1975 to 2015. The data is in the percentage.

Overall, it is seen clearly from the given table chart that Finsbury ltd had been hired the highest proportion of women in the starting year, which was at the last place in the following time. Elden ltd showed a reverse trend as compared to Finsbury Ltd, whereas the trend of Bamforth ltd increased during the time.

To begin with, the percentage of women who had been participated in higher-level posts at Eiden ltd was 3%, which was six times and thirteen-time lower than Bamforth Ltd and Finsbury Ltd respectively in 1975. Furthermore, the portion of women at all three companies showed an upward trend in the following twenty years.

Moreover, the share of women in senior posts at Finsbury Ltd was nearly 26%, which was the lowest share among all companies. Whereas Eiden Ltd was in the first position with 64% women and Bamforth Ltd accounted for 46% in 2015.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, whereas, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88202247191 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6038886461 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522471910112 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5653408308 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158203119826 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849442120993 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092346032577 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130627431043 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954717153895 0.0819641961636 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.