The table below shows the projected costings over the next five year in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set up.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information about the predicted cost of three environmental schemes for sustainable forestry in the next five years, and the forecasted spending breakdown allocation once the plans are made.
Overall, South East Asia is predicted to spend most on three environmental projects while salaries are expected to be the highest breakdown allowance.
In West Africa, the estimated cost in year 1 is 10.5 million, whereas Central America will spend twice as much as the aforementioned area (20 million) and South-east Asia will cost 30 million. It is predicted that West Africa will spend less money on these projects im the next four years as the cost will fall by 7 million in year 5. The same pattern can be seen for Central America. However, South-east Asia’s expenditure is expected to rise to 50 million in year 4 and year 5.
According to the pie chart, 50℅ of first year’s projected expenditure will be used to cover salaries. This is followed by set-up costs (30%) meanwhile the percentage of training and office expenses will be the same, at 10% each.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93922651934 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77658253608 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7229962911 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314069545879 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142927958553 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765374844817 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190453276744 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456921628891 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.