The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Given is the table illustrating the percentage of different family types living in impoverishment in Australia around 1999.
It can be seen from the table that all family types occupied the most percentage on single parent. By contrast, aged couple was the category receiving the least expenditure.
In 1999, the rate of one-parent was highest, at 21%, while the figure for people who live alone and did not have children was significant lower, at 19%. Old people lived in poverty accounted for 6%. Meanwhile, a mere number of 7% was couples who had no children.
The proportion of old couple was lowest in all household types, at only 4%. By contrast, the percentage of all households and couples lived with children were approximately, at 11% and 12% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 648.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 128.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93932788874 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6640625 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2162242219 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224373309308 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100566462874 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104051507246 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153848665201 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118507479849 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.