The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012.
The given table illustrates the survey results of the questionnaire related to the new theatre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that almost members of the club were chosen as excellent, while a small percentage of participants were ranked poor in three categories.
As per the table, the vast majority of opinions were ranked excellent in theatre facilities, at 72%, while 26% were satisfied and only 2% for poor. Regarding theatre information, more than half the proportion of members was excellent, whereas only 16% said they were poor. In addition, a large number of people chose excellent, which was the highest percentage of the three categories, at 88% and 2% ranked to be poor.
In terms of the general public, 64% were excellent and 24% ranked it as satisfied. Furthermore, there are a lot of differences between excellent opinions and satisfied opinions, about 66% and 20% respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the theatre was ranked as excellent at 53% and 2% as they were poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012. Overall, it can be seen tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y 16% said they were poor. In addition, a large number of people chose excellent, which was the h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...% ranked to be poor. In terms of the general public, 64% were excellent and 24% ranked it a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92270871619 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534090909091 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6063956855 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242446880869 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118945287309 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156746695003 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193393992286 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193406879971 0.0819641961636 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.