The given table illustrates the survey results of the questionnaire relating to the new theatre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012.
Overall, it can be seen that almost members of the club felt completely satisfactory when rating its facilities, information and qualities. On the contrary, a small percentage of participants ranked these three categories as poor.
As per the table, the vast majority of opinions ranked theatre facilities excellent, at 72%, while 26% were satisfied and only 2% for poor. Regarding theatre information, more than half the proportion of members voted it as excellent, whereas only 16% said it was poor. In addition, a large number of people thought its quality was excellent, which was the highest percentage of the three categories, at 88% and 2% ranked to be poor.
In terms of the general public, most of the members were contented and ranked its facilities wonderful and contented at 64% and 24% respectively. Furthermore, there are a lot of differences between excellent opinions and satisfied opinions in term of information, about 66% and 20% respectively. Additionally, the percentage of the theatre goers rated its quality as excellent at 53% and 2% as they were poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tre in one town of club members and the general public in 2012. Overall, it can be seen tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...only 16% said it was poor. In addition, a large number of people thought its quality was excellen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...% ranked to be poor. In terms of the general public, most of the members were contented and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16336633663 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05008754239 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544554455446 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2172769107 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266660175583 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111204231077 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151781518123 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197589812098 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192307393385 0.0819641961636 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.