The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The tabular chart depicts the percentage of students giving positive ratings about one university in 2000, 2005 and 2010. The striking feature of the chart is an improvement of pupil's virtue of the university's electronic resources.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly seen that there was a consistency in the student's view regarding the teaching facilities and buildings in all the years. However, only 32% individuals gave the good ratings to the range of modules offered which further steadily dropped by 2% in the following year. Again, after the interval of 5 years it collapsed to 27%. Although, almost a half number of Students provided a positive rating to electronic gadgets which later became a review of a significant majority of individuals.
Moving further, there was approximately a uniform positive rating for the print resources in 2000, 2005 and 2010. Last but not least, almost two-third people credited the good reviews in the subsequent years while the number was surged by 6% in 2010.
All-in-all, the satisfaction rate of scholars was declined for some aspects and remained steady for the others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars while the number was surged by 6% in 2010. All-in-all, the satisfaction ra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1978021978 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8350583505 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620879120879 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6814361903 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.111111111 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109857944849 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488785288955 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857883188112 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.072816504459 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750802448229 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.