The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
A glance at the given diagram illustrates the outcomes of surveys relating to one university in 2000, 2005, and 2010.
It can be easily seen that while electronic resources increased continuously, the range of modules offered decreased incessantly. In particular, there was a significant improvement in the attitude of pupils when evaluating the electronic resources. To be more precise, it soared from 45 percent at the first point to 88 percent by 2010 which was recognized as the highest percentage in the survey.
In the meanwhile, evaluations toward the range of modules offered were indicating that it had to get a slump during the period. In detail, It accounted for 32 percent in 2000 and inclined to 27 percent by 2010, the lowest bottom has ever been recorded.
On the other side, the most unique category may be building/teaching facilities because it did not fluctuate over the times with 77 percent. Besides that, a couple of aspects moving up and down unpredictably which were print resources, got average 88 percent and teaching quality, from 65 percent at the initial year inclining to 63 by 2005 and finally peak by 69 percent in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...een recorded. On the other side, the most unique category may be building/teaching facil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, may, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9792746114 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96933236314 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658031088083 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.688691938 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940743807978 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462620330951 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715720511744 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100341353202 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889840471835 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.