The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table indicated the index of students’ reflection on different aspects of a university over a 5-year interval of 2000, 2005 & 2010. Information was given in percentage, illustrated teaching quality, range of modules offered, buildings/teaching facilities, print & electronics resources.
As we could see, the data had the tendencies of going up, with an exception for the variation of provided modules. Given modules were reported to gain a 5-percentages-decrease rating for 10 years, from 32% to 27% - and also ranked as least preferred aspects for 3 given period. The equipments were rated equally from 2000 to 2010, at 77%. According to the students, teaching quality and print resources was not always at good pace. Whereas, teaching quality slightly fell of in the first 5 year and recovered up to 69%. Print resouces’ grades reflected different trend. It peaked at 89% in 2005 and minimal slipped by 1% 5 years later. Out of 5 categories, electronic resources revealed to be favoured by students: from 45% scored in 2000 – only place over the least of 32, its mark jumped to be in 3rd position in 2005 and peaked top of 88% in 2010.
With 88 percentages scored, print and electronic resources are two groups ranked top – also 1.3 times higher than 2nd place and 3.3 times much more than the categories rated least. According to the data, the university should invest more on the provision for modules as well as stablize the teaching quality, as to satisfy their students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, whereas, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04032258065 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09125351918 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 106.607317073 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4024773421 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106614928097 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412743546889 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041474634133 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709756758327 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398574268913 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.