The table below shows the salaries of secondary/high school teachers in 2009. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The given table provides insights into how much wage secondary and high school teachers can earn in 2009.
Looking from an overall perspective, it can be readily apparent that in Luxembourg, two kinds of teachers can have the highest starting salaries, while the starting salary for teachers working in Australia is the lowest figure. According to 5 nations, the least required years to reach the maximum salary can be seen in Denmark.
In detail, Luxembourg has the highest income for teachers when they just start their occupation, at nearly 80,000 dollars, which is nearly double in comparison with Denmark. After 15 years, the salary can be surged up to 119,000 dollars for teachers and required 30 years to gain the highest wage, approximately 132,000 dollars. Coming to Denmark, after 15 years, teachers can obtain 54,000 dollars, which is also the maximum salary they can earn.
Turning to the other nations, the starting salary teachers can earn in Australia and Korea is 28,000 dollars and 30,000 dollars, in turn. After 15 years, the figure for both 2 nations is equal to 48,000 dollars. Although the highest salary in Korea is nearly one and a half larger than that in Australia, it takes 34 years to obtain the maximum salary, while in Australia, teachers only need 9 years. Moreover, teachers in Japan need the longest time out of the five nations to achieve the highest income, with 37 years.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96624472574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42928069383 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0481554665 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123013695176 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604102718798 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554080675719 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104388508289 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660412196436 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, moreover, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96624472574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42928069383 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0481554665 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123013695176 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604102718798 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554080675719 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104388508289 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660412196436 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.