The table depicts the data about socio-economic levels for Canada, Japan, Peru and Zaire in 1994 in accordance with United Nations statistics.
According to the table,annual incomes of $15 760 and $11 100 per person in Japan and Canada respectively, were overwhelmingly greater than the same ones in Peru ($160) and in Zaire ($130). The health indicators, such as life expectancy at birth, were higher in more economically developed countries. For instance, 78 years was reported in Japan as the highest rate, following by Canada (76), Peru (51) and Zaire (47).
The amount of calories ingested daily per person for each Canadian was 3 326 calories while in Japan people took 2846 calories per capita. Meanwhile in Peru and Zaire these figures were 1927 and 1749, respectively. Regarding literacy rates among adults, Canada and Japan both reported literacy rates of 99%, while Peru registered 68% and Zaire, had a literacy rate of just over one third.
To sum up, the data confirms the relationship between national affluence, health and education, which suggests that richer societies like Japan and Canada contribute more in healthcare and education than poorer ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , annual
...s statistics. According to the table,annual incomes of 5 760 and 1 100 per person i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life expectancy at birth, were higher in more economically developed countries. F...
^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed countries. For instance, 78 years was reported in Japan as the highest rate, f...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...n people took 2846 calories per capita. Meanwhile in Peru and Zaire these figures were 19...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, third, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18617021277 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79879747669 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7625355432 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.23603664747 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111182454314 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556499309581 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882334732966 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965600340465 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110448181233 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.