The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.
Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries?
The table provides the social and economic statistics for four countries, surveyed by the United Nations in 1994, namely Canada, Japan, Peru, and Zaire.
Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that the data was measured by the same categories, in terms of annual income, life expectancy, calories supply, and literacy rate in all countries. Regarding the first indicator, people in Japan had the highest annual wage among the countries, earning $15,760 per individual. It was followed by Canada with $11,100 salary per person, but the rest of the countries had an income of not more than $1000.
Likewise, life expectancy was the highest figure in Japan, and the rest is followed the same trend as the first category. Interestingly, calories consumption in Canada is higher than in any other country on the list. Japan stood as the second place in that category, followed by Peru and Zaire respectively. According to the chart, the citizens of Zaire had the lowest literacy rate with only 34%, whilst the rate of the two states, Canada and Japan, had three times the percentage of Zaire.
To sum up, it can be observed that Canada and Japan had outstanding figures in all categories, portraying their high standard of social and economic situations whereas Peru and Zaire had significantly lower numbers, depicting their struggles in local communities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...hereas Peru and Zaire had significantly lower numbers, depicting their struggles in l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, look, regarding, second, so, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14798206278 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73412451579 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2353266168 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.555555556 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0937706814956 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452279363893 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786785698201 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856469293334 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10102195308 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.