The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne.
The given table illustrates the proportion of five different types of fast food taken by the citizen of Melbourne and comparison between past, present and future.
To begin with, hamburger is considere as the major fast food in Melbourne, which is eaten relatively in high portion than others. As per the table, 40 was recorded in 2005, 38 at present and it was predicted to increase in future with 5%. However, fried chicken is second most popular street food, which is lessen by on significant portion. While, 35, 37 n=and 45 units are accounted for fried chicken. Moreover, salad is considered as less eaten street food in past, only by 5, while this portion increase by 15 in present and rapid increase is estimated in 2025, which is by 41. Furthermore, fried rice and noodles consumed portion was likely in equall quantity. The same portion six unit was consumed in 2005 and nine units is predicted for 2025 for both. However, in present fried rice exceed noodles by only one unit.
Overall, the table depicts the comparison of major street food eaten by Melbourne people. However, hamburger is the most liked food in Melbourne and fired rice and noodles are list liked in the list of Melbourne people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lessened'.
Suggestion: lessened
...cond most popular street food, which is lessen by on significant portion. While, 35, 3...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...is considered as less eaten street food in past, only by 5, while this portion increase...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46857093388 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7371025108 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6363636364 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9090909091 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179607165684 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723733200926 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685183043188 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157462137209 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571760304603 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.