the table gives information about consumer spending
The table depicts the proportion of money spent on three groups of commodities in five countries in 2002.
Overall, among the three groups of items the most amount of money was spent on food/drinks/tobacco in the five countries. While the least amount was spent on leisure/education. Also, Sweden was recorded to have spent less than any other country on the different items.
Turkey and Ireland recorded the highest proportion of expenditure on food/drinks/tobacco at 32.14% and 28.9% respectively. They were followed by Spain which spent 18.80% on the same items, then Italy which spent 16.36%. This showed a marginal difference to the proportion of money spent by Sweden on same items. Whereas the least amount of money was spent on leisure/education across the five countries, Turkey remains the country that spent the highest on same items at 4.35%. Close to this is Sweden which spent 3.22% which was slightly above that spent by Italy.
Sweden recorded the least expenditure for food/drinks/tobacco and clothing/footwear at 15.77% and 5.40% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d/drinks/tobacco in the five countries. While the least amount was spent on leisure/e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ference to the proportion of money spent by Sweden on same items. Whereas the lea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42045480228 2.65546596893 129% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6767050062 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0108895229193 0.215688989381 5% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00665592466079 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199677739824 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.016639811652 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288209992096 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.