The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996.
The table illustrates the number of people going to different tourist attractions in Australia during the four-year period from 1996.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that all the sites experienced upward trends except for the case of Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve and Macquarie Island in the number of visitors. Additionally, it is apparent that the figure for travelers to Great Barrier Reef was the highest while Macquarie Island was the least favored among the sites.
In 1996, there were 1670 million people going to Great Barrier Reef and this number increased twofold in 2000. Both Blue Mountains and Tasmania attracted around half a million visitors in 1996, after that these figures rose gradually over the period shown. Similarly, the number of holiday makers going to Shark Bay increased steadily to 89 million in 2000 from the starting point of 84 million in 1996.
In contrast, there were only 350 visits paid to Macquarie Island in 1996 before falling by 40 in 1998, then this number rose marginally to 330 in the next two years. Although Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve attracted 810 million travelers in 1996, this figure declined substantially during the period.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, then, while, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49567146643 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.8965062837 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405134516173 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207928470765 0.103423049105 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.303626327767 0.0843802449381 360% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34521622235 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.382472117941 0.0819641961636 467% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.