The table shows the average annual percentages of water pollution in four large cities in 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the table illustrating the regular rate of polluted water by four main cities around 2003.
It is clear from the table that water in almost countries was spent the most on Domestic Sewage. By contrast, Phosphates in detergents was the category receiving the least expenditure.
For the Domestic Sewage, the rate of waste in Sao Paulo was highest, at 65%, while, the figure for this purpose in Taipei was significantly lower, at 50%. In New York, it occupied 41% by this factor of the total expenditure. Meanwhile, the percentage of the water pollution for was sewage in Tokyo was the lowest, at 23%.
The proportion of the phosphates in detergents was highest in New York, at 34%, while, the figure for Sao Paulo was lowest, at 6%. In terms of Erosion, the percentage of expenditure on this category in Tokyo was higher than other countries, at 23%. By contrast, spending on this item in Taipei and New York made up the same smallest proportion, at 12%. On top of that, the water pollution for pesticides was foremost in Tokyo, at 31%, in comparison, only 9% of pesticides used in Sao Paulo of the total spending in this category.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the total spending in this category.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, as for, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.755 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70661689199 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7247457272 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100513672376 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562658495213 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854959040232 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106231366854 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105834042598 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.