The table shows the comparison between the primary school A and the primary school B about the problems of education confronting students.
The table shows the comparison between the primary school A and the primary school B about the problems of education confronting students. There are seven areas of problem presented in the table and the proportions of students in every those areas have many fluctuations in both 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of students had problems in education of primary school A is always higher than those of primary school B. Besides, the highest percentages of those students appear in many different problem areas.
In 2005 and 2015, all of problem areas of school A were like reading ability, handwriting, spelling, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, concentration in lessons and following instruction having higher percentage than school B. The largest distance of proportion being in problem areas of following instructions was 36% in 2005 and in handwriting was 21% in 2015.
Additionally, it is not difficult to realize that the highest proportion was in the following instructions with 42% in school A and in the concentration in lessons with 15% in school B in 2005. In 2015, the handwriting took the highest percentage with 28% in school A while both the verbal expression of ideas and the concentration in lessons got the top proportion together with 15% in school B.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...percentages of those students appear in many different problem areas. In 2005 and 2015, all...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol A while both the verbal expression of ideas and the concentration in lessons g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15639810427 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01254089084 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436018957346 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4578452019 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442998558305 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239937036967 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.275005071591 0.0843802449381 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307691555958 0.15604864568 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208893322515 0.0819641961636 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.