The table shows the cost of water in 5 cities in Australia.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table graph elucidates the precise information regarding how water is sold in five major cities in Australia. The figures are measured in kilolitres
Overall, from the table it is evident that people from Perth paid for the highest water consumption with respect to the household, whereas Melbourne sold the least of all. However, the rest of the cities depicted a fair bill rate.
As per the table, it demonstrates that consumption is classified on the basis of two categories, for the first one can use a maximum of 125KL, and the second starts with a minimum of 125KL without limit. Perth and Adelaide saw the water consumption with a worth of $0.42 for up to 125KL, while the charges for over 124KL rose to $1.50 and $1.00 respectively. Similarly, Brisbane noticed the consumption level charge of $0.81 for first category, and it gradually increased to $0.84 for next category. In contrast, Sydney and Melbourne remained unaltered in both categories with $0.98 and $0.78 each.
Furthermore, according to the usage the average bills per household are calculated for these cities. Perth being the most popular amongst all, it accounted for $332, followed by Sydney with $319 and $312 for Adelaide. Although Melbourne showed a constant utility rate for both groups, it witnessed an extremely low charge with $253, while Brisbane noticed a far better amount with $310.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e figures are measured in kilolitres Overall, from the table it is evident th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he cities depicted a fair bill rate. As per the table, it demonstrates that c...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ategories with sh.98 and sh.78 each. Furthermore, according to the usage the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09691629956 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69102064525 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1533667939 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.7 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0715364009595 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368324775342 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617753229675 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723854107413 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710093073996 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.